You're not fooling anyone Joe!
Are you f'n kidding me!?! Joe LIEberman now wants to disband FEMA?!?
Who does he think he's fooling? I hope he doesn't think he's fooling me as I've been ripping into Lieberman since the Katrina diaster.
Here's the deal: Joe Lieberman is the very senator who wanted to include FEMA as part of Homeland security. Also, let's not forget that Joe was also the senator who approved Michael Brown to head FEMA after having an exhausting 8 minute interview with him (I guess Joe was impressed with Brown's resume).
Let's go back into the ConnecticutBLOG's archive for this oldie but goodie.
From the Hartord CourantSo, now the person who not only wanted FEMA merged into Homeland security AND approved Michael Brown to head FEMA (after a very intense 8 minute interview) wants to come on TV and say that FEMA should be eliminated?Michael D. Brown, relieved of his hurricane relief duties Friday, didn't get much scrutiny from the Senate at a 2002 confirmation hearing.
The head of the Federal Emergency Management Agency appeared before the Senate Governmental Affairs Committee, then chaired by Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman, D-Conn., when he was nominated as the agency's deputy director. The polite 42-minute hearing attracted only four senators, and before it was over, Lieberman offered his support.
Since Katrina struck last month, Brown has been under fire - and the target of angry Democrats who want him to resign - because of his performance in getting aid to storm victims.
His resume has also been questioned. Time Magazine reported Thursday that Brown's FEMA biography says his previous emergency management experience was "serving as an assistant city manager with emergency services oversight."
But when Brown was an assistant to the city manager of Edmond, Okla., in the late 1970s, he was "more like an intern," with no supervisory authority, Time said.
But bloggers on Friday suggested that Lieberman could have learned three years ago that Brown might not be up to such a task. An online debate began late Thursday when Juliette N. Kayyem, a lecturer in public policy at Harvard University's John F. Kennedy School of Government, posted an account of Brown's June 19, 2002, confirmation hearing.
Titled "42 Minutes of Shame," she described how "Mike Brown suffered 42 breathtaking minutes of serious nothingness (unless Lieberman's withering questioning regarding whether Brown would sufficiently keep the Senate informed - duh, yes) to become deputy director of FEMA."
Lieberman talked about FEMA's expanding role, how the disaster relief agency has "got to prepare for and respond to terrorist attacks at home." He quizzed Brown about whether the new mission would find FEMA continuing to maintain its network of strong contacts with state and local officials.
"We've already started down that path," Brown said. "Our partnership has to be with all agencies responding to disasters, all first responders."
Lieberman told him, "That's a good answer."
He spent 8 minutes asking Brown a series of questions, including one on chemical and biological preparedness. "Regardless of the cause of the disaster," Brown assured him, "our response is the same."
Later in the hearing, Lieberman returned for a new round of questions, notably one about preparedness in Connecticut in case of a disaster at a nuclear facility.
Brown said FEMA's role was "a very serious one," and he pledged to look closely at evacuation plans to make sure they were adequate.
Such replies were adequate for Lieberman, who told Brown at the end of the hearing, "I certainly will support your nomination."
Two words: Ned Lamont