<xmp> <body><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <div id="navbar-iframe-container"></div> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://apis.google.com/js/plusone.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> gapi.load("gapi.iframes:gapi.iframes.style.bubble", function() { if (gapi.iframes && gapi.iframes.getContext) { gapi.iframes.getContext().openChild({ url: 'https://www.blogger.com/navbar.g?targetBlogID\x3d11782355\x26blogName\x3dConnecticutBLOG\x26publishMode\x3dPUBLISH_MODE_BLOGSPOT\x26navbarType\x3dSILVER\x26layoutType\x3dCLASSIC\x26searchRoot\x3dhttps://connecticutblog.blogspot.com/search\x26blogLocale\x3den_US\x26v\x3d2\x26homepageUrl\x3dhttp://connecticutblog.blogspot.com/\x26vt\x3d-5344443236411396584', where: document.getElementById("navbar-iframe-container"), id: "navbar-iframe" }); } }); </script> </xmp>

Saturday, January 07, 2006

Lamont update

I was hoping to do work around the house but this Ned Lamont rumor is gaining steam and is the talk of all the CT Blogs (check here, here, and here).

Like I said yesterday, it's very hard to get info during the weekend in Connecticut and I just came back from the silly anti-immigrant protest in Danbury (I'll post a report later).

For those looking for some info on Lamont, here's a brief profile and his contribution list.

One advantage he has is that he has money (and lots of it) which should give Lieberman some concern. He's also anti-war and wouldn't have the baggage Weicker would bring (income tax) as well as his support (Weicker said he would bow out if a Democrat challenged Lieberman and accoring to rumors, he will support Lamont).

As Drudge would say ...developing.